Your Words Matter
How to Report with Care and Integrity on Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence
This guide, developed from RNW Media’s research, is designed for media makers—including journalists, content creators, podcasters, bloggers, and civic actors—who use media to influence social change. It provides practical support for sharing stories and information about technology-facilitated gender-based violence.
If you haven't already, we recommend reading Rising Tides: Navigating the hidden currents of tech-facilitated gender violence first.
Technologies offer endless ways to connect, create, and learn. But they also have impacts and side-effects. How do they affect our world, communities, and environment? Journalists, content creators, podcasters, and bloggers play a role in helping people understand these technologies and their effects, especially when they cause harm.
Digital platforms can be used to control, silence, or harass. From unwanted messages and cyberstalking to sharing Non-Consensual Intimate Images (NCII), Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV) is rising globally, making it urgent to raise awareness, give voice to survivors, and push for systemic change. Reporting and informing with care and integrity about TFGBV is not just about protecting survivors, it's about informing society, challenging stereotypes, and showing the complexity of the issue.
Are you creating or sharing information about TFGBV? This Data Detox guide will walk you through the essentials: what to know before you hit "publish," the do's and don'ts of covering TFGBV, and how to make sure your words truly help, not harm. You'll learn practical tips, first steps for becoming a safety conscious media maker, and why the way you frame a story matters so much.
Ready to find out why your words matter and how to use them for good? Let's go.
Safety First
For media-makers the digital world offers endless opportunities, but also risks like censorship, surveillance, and data leaks. Reporting on TFGBV can endanger both survivors and yourself. Staying safe means protecting your own and your sources' digital, physical, and psychological well-being. Safety isn't just a checklist, it's an ongoing process of assessing risks, verifying information, and investigating carefully online and offline.
By using simple practices and basic tools, you can develop a safety-focused mindset: adapting behaviors and attitudes to your context, style, and goals to protect yourself, your sources, and the evidence you gather. Before creating content, ask yourself: Who or what needs to be protected?
Click or tap on the cards below to read further information:
Yourself
Tap to flip
Yourself
Click to flip
Stay safe, minimize risks, and mitigate threats to yourself.
Your Contacts
Tap to flip
Your Contacts
Click to flip
People you engage with (sources, collaborators, colleagues, close contacts, etc.) and those whose information you have access to, collect, use, backup if needed and store.
Your Data
Tap to flip
Your Data
Click to flip
Information you collect should be safe from being accessed by others and must be recoverable in case of loss, damage, or theft. Be mindful of the communication channels you use (email, text or chat, etc.).
Tip: The Do No Harm principle means you prioritize the safety and well-being of yourself and others, and help as much as you can without causing unnecessary harm. You can think of the simple ABC formula: Actions + Behaviors = Consequences. It assumes that all your behaviors and actions have consequences of some sort, be it positive or negative, or both. The idea is to not cause more risk or harm than there was before.
Learn more about safety first, the do no harm principle and how to nourish your investigation mindset by reading Exposing the Invisible's The Kit.
Better Ways to Phrase It
The words we use to tell stories about TFGBV matter. The way we shape the narrative can empower and protect survivors, but it can also spread misinformation, reinforce stereotypes, or amplify harm. Explore the cards below for guidance on respectful and accurate language when covering tech-enabled gender-based violence:
Ask survivors how they'd like to be described

Tap to find out more

Click to find out more
Some survivors may wish to include details like their profession, online presence or gender, while others may prefer to keep this information private or remain anonymous. Always check their preferred pronouns; TFGBV survivors can be of all genders.
Avoid legal jargon

Tap to find out more

Click to find out more
Skip legal jargon unless it's clearly explained. Use straightforward, inclusive language that helps everyone understand the issue.
Violence doesn't just happen, name the harm and its source

Tap to find out more

Click to find out more
Use an active voice to show who is responsible. For example, 'Online mobs coordinated harassment' makes the harm — and its source — clearer than 'Harassment occurred online'.
Watch out for coded language

Tap to find out more

Click to find out more
Coded language refers to words or phrases that might seem neutral but carry indirect meanings. Terms like 'woke journalist' or 'influencer drama' can carry bias and reinforce harmful narratives.
Why language matters
The selection of wording and phrases changes the meaning of the story. Explore the examples below to understand why:
Why language matters: Choose the better option
Which term better describes the issue?
Tech-facilitated gender-based violence
Online drama


Which term is more accurate?
Revenge porn
Non-consensual sharing of intimate images


How should you describe AI-generated intimate content?
Leaked nudes or explicit content
Digitally manipulated sexual image


The Do's and Don'ts
What to do and what to avoid? Guess and explore the cards below:
Describing the Abuse
Describing the Abuse
Do
Don't


Describing the Motive
Do
Don't


Acknowledge the Impact
Do
Don't


Quote survivors accurately
Do
Don't


When images speak louder than words
Every image has the power to tell a story, to move people, spark emotions, and shape how your audience understands an issue. In the context of TFGBV, the visuals you choose can create entirely different narratives. Explore the cards below for essential tips on selecting images that bring your stories and publications to life with impact and meaning:


Use illustrations or graphics to explain tech abuse without showing real harmful content.


Avoid using real screenshots of abuse or threats, even if blurred, as they can retraumatize and spread harm.


Show survivors with images that reflect strength, confidence, and support, not helplessness.


Skip stereotypical or stigmatizing images like people crying in the dark or hiding their faces.


Use clear infographics or platform visuals to explain how the abuse works and its bigger context.


Avoid overly aggressive or "hacker movie" visuals that sensationalize or oversimplify the issue.


Get consent before using any identifiable photo of a survivor, and clearly explain the risks. Make sure the picture doesn't reveal the person's sensitive data like where they live or work.


Protect anonymity with avatars, symbolic objects, or abstract visuals, never show real personal details.
Your to-go kick-off check list
Now that we have covered the basics of creating and sharing content on TFGBV, it's time to roll up your sleeves and get ready for the process.
Ask yourself: Am I ticking all the key boxes? Am I being safety-conscious here? Am I covering the essentials to ensure the content I create is safe, respectful, and helpful? Am I avoiding anything that could harm survivors, reinforce stereotypes, or slow down action and support?
For readers, viewers, or listeners of TFGBV content, this list is your "spot-the-problem" guide. It'll help you know what to look out for when you're reading an article, watching a video, or tuning into a podcast on the topic.
- Safety & Privacy of Survivors: Am I protecting the survivor's identity? Did I get consent before sharing the story? Am I avoiding amplifying harm? Is the survivor emotionally and digitally safe from retaliation after the story is published?
- Trauma-Informed Approach: Did I avoid sensitive or judgmental language? Am I avoiding sensationalism? Did I give the survivor control over their story? Have I avoided reinforcing gender stereotypes?
- Accurate & Respectful Language: Am I using correct terms? Did I avoid victim-blaming? Did I clearly explain the form of abuse? Have I included diverse voices and perspectives — not just male experts or official sources? Have I used inclusive language (e.g., "survivor" instead of assuming gender; "they" instead of defaulting to "she")?
- Context & Systems Analysis: Have I linked the case to wider patterns? Am I providing data or expert commentary to frame the issue beyond the individual case? Did I include context about how the tech platform enabled or failed to prevent the abuse? Have I considered how intersectionality (e.g., race, class, sexuality, disability, activism, public role) affects who is targeted and how?
- Legal & Tech Literacy: Do I understand and clearly explain the legal status of the behaviour in question? Have I accurately described platform responses, moderation failures, or policy gaps? Did I verify digital evidence carefully to avoid spreading disinformation?
- Supporting the Audience: Am I providing resources for readers? Did I avoid leaving the audience feeling hopeless by showing pathways to action or reform?
- Post-Publication Considerations: Am I monitoring for backlash? Have I sought legal or editorial advice? Do I have a plan for follow-ups?
Further Reading
Technology-facilitated gender-based violence: Developing a shared research agenda, UN Women, 2024
Decoding technology-facilitated gender-based violence: a reality check from seven countries, Rutgers
Reporting on Gender-Based Violence: A Guide for Journalists. RNW Media, 2025.
Content based on RNW Media research.


